| 1 1 1 Building
the
Slo-mo IV at
Jensens: In the process of 1 1 1 1 |
1 The Building of
Slo-mo-shun IV & V Reprinted, courtesy of "US Boats1" 1953 There's an apocryphal tale about the mountaineer who scaled the highest peak man had ever conquered and got home safety to tell his wife about it. "Now that you've done that," said the sweet little woman, "what do you do next?" We recount this story in a book about boats because the following article is by and (somewhat) about a man who happens to be a skier and mountaineer, as well as a boatman, and because he found himself in somewhat the same situation as the man in the story. Anchor Jensen had the answer to "what do you do next," however. Having built the first Slo-Mo-Shun he quite logically went ahead and built another. When you're out in front of the field and still try to better your own best efforts, you're really in there pitching--if we may mix a baseball metaphor with boating and mountaineering! Anchor Jensen
grew up with boats, being the son of Tony Jensen, founder
of the Jensen Motor-Boat Company of Seattle. Even as a
lad, he took an active part in the business and, when he
went off to school, took an engineering course at
Seattle's Washington School of Engineering. Came the war,
and Mr. Jensen went to Great Lakes Naval Training Center
Basic Engineering School, from which he graduated with
honors-and then served in the U. S. Navy on the USS Iowa
and USS Belleau Wood. Soon alter V-Day. Mr. Jensen was
back to his true love, high-speed boats. He's been
building them ever since, and is now manager of the boat
company where he spent his childhood. Both Slo-Mo-Shuns
IV and V were built under his supervision and active
participation. Mr. Jensen is a member of the Seattle
Yacht Club, Corinthian Yacht Club, A.P.B.A., and the
Seattle Mountaineers. I have been asked to write an article on the building of Slo-Mo-Shuns IV and V. To cramp a lifetime ambition into such a short article is impossible, however, here are some of the highlights: At the start, Mr. S. S. Sayres, the owner, summed it up in a very few words by saying: "I want a boat to win the Gold Cup, Harmsworth Race and to set the mile straightaway world record with a budget of so much." We lived up to his wishes and succeeded setting records in all categories including exceeding the budget. A
boat builder, carpenter or contractor usually has plans,
building codes and specifications to work with. Materials
are stressed with great safety factors and a relatively
large margin of latitude is permissible. In the case of the Slo-Mo-Shuns it was different. We had nothing to guide us except to look at what was running and its good or bad points. We had no tables for hull stress nor any data to guide us for the over one hundred miles per hour class. Thus we took on the job of building the vessels with only ideas scattered in the minds of three people: Ted Jones, S. S. Sayres and myself as the builder, had the last vote, for it was my job to collect these ideas and develop them into final results. It was decided that a three-point hull similar to the propeller riding California boats was our answer in regard to hull-form. To make it strong and light, mindful of the budget, we chose wood for construction, with Dural aluminum riding surfaces. Each piece of wood to be used for battens, frames and so on was given a break test on the part that was cut off as waste, and was carefully checked for grain run-out. All metal parts and welds were magnafluxed, X-rayed, or zyglowed to check for flaws. Of special interest was the vast use of welded high carbon steels in the rudders and steering gear and struts. We devised a welding procedure which most experts would frown upon, although the results have been most satisfactory. The
hull on Slo-Mo-Shun IV is 1/2' thick Tanguile mahogany
laid up in five plys, with each ply laid 45' off the
center of the sheet alternately. Slo-Mo-Shun V is the
same Iexcept for 7/16" thickness. Decking is
Tanguile mahagony 3/16' thick over 5/8" square oak
battens on 6"centers, fastened to laminated spruce
deck beams. The frames are 7/8" by 3" oak,
half, lapped at the chines with 1/4" plywood gussets
glued on both sides. The chines are oak 1 ½"
square, glued and, bolted to frames. The bottom battens
are 7/8" x 1 ¼" oak and are piled on to the
frames without notching. Engine beds are made of 1
1/4" spruce fastened with Dural aluminum T sections
to the frames. Thus we have four fore and aft spars, two
engine beds and both vertical sides of the hull extending
from transom to none-trip forward. Transversely, the
frames are spaced at 18" centers with 9"
centers at points of localized stress. The fore and aft
bottom battens make again in form, a truss with the
engine stringers, thus giving us an equivalent member of
20" in section. Transversely we gain a truss section
in the frames and planking making its section
4-3/4". In this way by placing each member for its
job and forming truss sections we have gained light
weight and strength of sections. The engine beds are
reinforced with Dural formers or bulkheads transversely
and fore and aft with long deep angles of Dural aluminum
to distribute the major concentrated load. The engine is
called upon for two purposes: to form the top transverse
chord of a truss and to supply power to drive the hull. I have had many people ask me, "Why did you do this or that or why did you not do it this or that way." To answer such questions you only have to explain the purpose of the installation, the job it does and its relative cost, to make any other way to seem impractical. We have even incorporated the skid fins in-to a structural member of the hull. Thus any part that was necessary and could offer structural strength was made to perform multiple jobs. I am always mindful of the old saying that what goes up must come down which has a rather parallel effect on high-speed boats, for added weight although having not too much effect on top speed-has two bad effects: one on acceleration and one on tearing up the hull structure. We played with several ideas which seemed good at the time (but back fired later) which meant additional work of correction. However, as a whole, careful planning and organization has produced what we desired and has been relatively dependable. We
increased the shaft diameter, beefed up the steering,
changed struts, added more HP and increased the gasoline
capacity in both boats as the demand warranted it.
Naturally we ran into problems which one normally expects
in any experimental endeavor. To name only a few: outer
plywood planking, struts, rudder and steering gear,
step-up gear and countless others. I wanted transverse
strength in the plywood which meant a special lay in the
plywood of a long fibred wood and hot press process glued
seam. Lots of string pulling and discussions with Elliott
Bay Lumber Co. in Seattle finally produced what we wanted
at a reasonable price. The firm cooperated with us to
manufacture a plywood that would flex and still have our
limits of transverse strength. |